Process

I work through six reviews, from the current course to a transferred system.

At each stage, I produce something reviewable and reduce a specific risk. I do not base the work on an untested, monolithic specification.

01

Diagnose

Course and system audit

Review
Documented joint decision
Risk reduced
Solving the wrong problem
02

Architect

Target learning map

Review
Documented joint decision
Risk reduced
Fragmented delivery
03

Prototype

One representative sequence

Review
Documented joint decision
Risk reduced
Late usability surprises
04

Build

Production-ready assets

Review
Documented joint decision
Risk reduced
Uncontrolled variation
05

Validate

Academic, usability and access review

Review
Documented joint decision
Risk reduced
Accuracy or accessibility gaps
06

Transfer

Documentation and handover

Review
Documented joint decision
Risk reduced
Vendor dependency

What I need from your team

A sponsor, a content expert and short review windows.

  • Access to non-sensitive assets
  • Explicit academic decisions
  • Scheduled review availability

Recommended starting point

I recommend an eight-week course transformation pilot.

I work with a fixed scope, faculty reviews and documented transfer. I define final scope after diagnosis.

Discuss the pilot